aaran Posted April 19, 2016 Report Share Posted April 19, 2016 Need help with tenants Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbut Posted April 19, 2016 Report Share Posted April 19, 2016 No thanks , I have it written into my tenancy agreements that the tenant is liable for any mould through not ventilating the property. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richlist Posted April 19, 2016 Report Share Posted April 19, 2016 Likewise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melboy Posted April 19, 2016 Report Share Posted April 19, 2016 Nor me. Already written into the AST contract about room ventilation being essential. Drying of wet clothes on hot radiator's will cause damp & mould to form as condensation on cold wall surfaces. Funny enough never had any complaints from tenant's on this subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richlist Posted April 19, 2016 Report Share Posted April 19, 2016 Here's my thoughts....... Flats are worse than houses because they usually have either little or no outside drying space &\or no room for a tumble drier. Writing a clause in the contract won't stop the tenant causing damage to your valuable property but I find a booklet on condensation will help. I find the younger the tenants the less awareness they have of the causes and effects of condensation. Regular 3 monthly inspections WILL identify problems and that's your opportunity to ensure the tenant knows what is expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mortitia Posted April 19, 2016 Report Share Posted April 19, 2016 Richlist is quite right - I also have a clause in my AST making the tenant responsible for the mold. BTW - damp is no excuse not to pay rent - evict via Section 21 instead - no fault eviction- no judges reports or need for your company either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaran Posted April 19, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2016 putting a clause in your tenancy is no defence in a court if your tenant makes an action under section 11 landlords and tenants act it wont hold-up... section 21 takes time and money.. some tenants will claim section 11 defence to avoid eviction and paying the rent i have delt with 1000's of cases like this.... i can see you all do not need my services here so I will delete my post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carryon Regardless Posted April 19, 2016 Report Share Posted April 19, 2016 What post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grampa Posted April 20, 2016 Report Share Posted April 20, 2016 9 hours ago, aaran said: putting a clause in your tenancy is no defence in a court if your tenant makes an action under section 11 landlords and tenants act it wont hold-up... section 21 takes time and money.. some tenants will claim section 11 defence to avoid eviction and paying the rent i have delt with 1000's of cases like this.... i can see you all do not need my services here so I will delete my post. Yes, but so does a section 8 which is the process a disrepair counter claim is likely to be used by the tenant so I dont see your point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richlist Posted April 20, 2016 Report Share Posted April 20, 2016 aaran Almost every aspect of being a landlord (and life itself) carries an adverse risk. Most people just accept those risks and many consider they just arent worth worrying about. Some of us here have taken a few easy, low cost actions to minimise those risks and for us that's enough. You are never going to sell a product to someone who doesn't want it.....and I don't want it. Getting upset won't make any difference to those landlords who's real chance of encountering this kind of problem is very small. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbut Posted April 20, 2016 Report Share Posted April 20, 2016 23 hours ago, aaran said: putting a clause in your tenancy is no defence in a court if your tenant makes an action under section 11 landlords and tenants act it wont hold-up... section 21 takes time and money.. some tenants will claim section 11 defence to avoid eviction and paying the rent i have delt with 1000's of cases like this.... i can see you all do not need my services here so I will delete my post. How do you know that aaran are you a landlord ? ,putting a clause is a defence , I won a case 3 years ago by having that clause in the contract . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbut Posted April 20, 2016 Report Share Posted April 20, 2016 23 hours ago, aaran said: putting a clause in your tenancy is no defence in a court if your tenant makes an action under section 11 landlords and tenants act it wont hold-up... section 21 takes time and money.. some tenants will claim section 11 defence to avoid eviction and paying the rent i have delt with 1000's of cases like this.... i can see you all do not need my services here so I will delete my post. Bye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.