Jump to content

tenant served notice, then wants to withdraw it.


stevie-b

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

I,m after a bit of advice guidance and support. I have a tenant who is two months into a six month AST last week they told me they were leaving as the property is too small for them.

They had a new property and would leave in two weeks and I could keep the remaining two weeks rent. (rent paid monthly and in advance).

I did not agree to anything but asked for confermation of there wishes in writing. I recieved a text, but no letter. I wished to meet with the tenants and the guarentor.

The tenants declined to meet with me and have now told me that they will not be moving out, as the other house fell through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they want to stay they stay.

If you want rid you've to use the usual repossession procedures.

Until they have surrendered it's in their possession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would politely point out to your tenants that if they wish to leave your property and serve notice to that effect then it MUST be done in writing and not by text as this is unacceptable and bad business practice.

It is worthwhile also pointing out to them that if they sign a 6 month contract then that is exactly what it is a contract and they can't just bail out on a whim or fancy because the property is too small for them because that decision should have been made before committing to rent the property from you.

If they wish to move for any reason then that time comes at the end of their time with you and not before.

Mel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Melboy, I had those conversations with the tenant and the gatentor at last week.

I appreciate i have the right to six months tenancy, however i would rather have a new paying tenant than an empty property and chasing a guarentor and tenant to pay the rent on the empty property.

I can appreciate your comments about best buisiness practice.

If a tenant notifies you verbally and by text but not by letter would a court agree that the LL had not been notified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a tenant notifies you verbally and by text but not by letter would a court agree that the LL had not been notified.

I would say in today's World of Tenancy law where everything is stacked against the landlord.......No. It's by formal letter or nothing in my book.

But there again I am a battle hardened, worn down by previous bad tenants, cynical old Git! :D

Always keep it business like and professional is the very simple answer.

Mel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a point i could do with clarifying. I ask for the tenant to serve notice and comunicate none emergency matters to my buisiness adress, which is on the AST (also the water meter, electric meter and gas meter).

I have everything done in writing as i appreciate any judge would expect a LL to d. I very rarely have a tenant right to me.

could i refuse to acept notice to leave via text, as i state in the AST that notice should be served at a specific adress?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks LAW I have never heared of this before.

I googled some info

“whereas great inconveniences have happened and may happen to landlords whose tenants have power to determine their leases, by giving notice to quit the premisses by them holden, and yet refusing to deliver up the possession when the landlord hath agreed with another tenant for the same”

The act goes on to provide that if a tenant gives notice and then fails to leave, a landlord can charge double rent “and such double rent or sum shall continue to be paid during all the time such tenant or tenants shall continue in possession as aforesaid“. However note the following:

  • The tenant must have served a proper valid notice to quit, which has been accepted by the landlord
  • The double rent can only be charged on a daily basis for the period of time the tenant overstays
  • It cannot be used if the tenant just fails to return the keys
  • It cannot be used if the tenant just stays on after the end of the fixed term (in which case his tenancy will be treated by law as continuing.

now i am confused.

Does the tenant stay on but pay double rent for Feb, March and April?

Am i still bound by the six month AST which will expire in April?

If the tenant leaves prior to April can i pursue for loss of rent until i have a new Tenant?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks LAW I have never heared of this before.

I googled some info

"whereas great inconveniences have happened and may happen to landlords whose tenants have power to determine their leases, by giving notice to quit the premisses by them holden, and yet refusing to deliver up the possession when the landlord hath agreed with another tenant for the same"

The act goes on to provide that if a tenant gives notice and then fails to leave, a landlord can charge double rent "and such double rent or sum shall continue to be paid during all the time such tenant or tenants shall continue in possession as aforesaid". However note the following:

  • The tenant must have served a proper valid notice to quit, which has been accepted by the landlord
  • The double rent can only be charged on a daily basis for the period of time the tenant overstays
  • It cannot be used if the tenant just fails to return the keys
  • It cannot be used if the tenant just stays on after the end of the fixed term (in which case his tenancy will be treated by law as continuing.

now i am confused.

Does the tenant stay on but pay double rent for Feb, March and April?

Am i still bound by the six month AST which will expire in April?

If the tenant leaves prior to April can i pursue for loss of rent until i have a new Tenant?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 1737 Act is good law and I have used it in the past. The key here is has there been been a proper notice to quit as per the common law rule, i.e 4 weeks ending on a rent day. In this case it seems not however a landlord has the power to waive the requirement for notice or indeed accept a notice notwithstanding which is defective. At the point the notice expired the tenant is holding over. Following on from the issue of the service of the notice the argument is whether the tenant can lawfully withdraw their notice prior to expiry and there are arguments both ways here. If you want the property back draw their attention to it, it might do the trick for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tenant can text put it in writing but if they change their mind the day before they're supposed to go then they can stay.

The tenancy is only terminated when the keys are returned by the tenant to the landlord.

If you have tenants waiting to move in after you receive notice then be careful how you word this to your prospective new tenants - tenancy granted on vacant possession.

You have to be super careful when dealing in these situations as there are many tenants who know the landlord and tenant act better than landlords and some solicitors !

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...