Guest caravanj Posted May 9, 2011 Report Share Posted May 9, 2011 As I understand the law a Section 21 is a 'no blame' application for repossession so on that basis I assume a court can't do anything other than grant possession to me since I not having to prove rent arrears, anti-social behaviour etc. Am I correct in my assumption? I know it should be the case but the more I see these dumb-ass Judges, the more I wonder!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grampa Posted May 9, 2011 Report Share Posted May 9, 2011 As long as the notice is served correctly, any deposit taken protected correctly, no conditions put on the notice and the correct prescribed info added to the bottom of the notice. Then yes you will get possession. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest caravanj Posted May 9, 2011 Report Share Posted May 9, 2011 As long as the notice is served correctly, any deposit taken protected correctly, no conditions put on the notice and the correct prescribed info added to the bottom of the notice. Then yes you will get possession. Cheers Grampa, I'm having it done by an eviction firm so I assume all the paperwork wiill be correct. There's no deposit & I didn't charge the T any rent because he was supposed to be doing work for me in lieu of rent & he's now in prison for 2 years anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.