tetley Posted September 27, 2010 Report Share Posted September 27, 2010 Hi, My Dad is 70 and has just secured an offer on a house. He doesn't currently own a home(lives on a boat) so he needs me to go on the deed with him. He is putting 30% deposit down on the property. I am already a home owner and will be thinking of increasing my current mortgage in the next 6months. I wondered if being 50% owner on a "but to let" property would be a positive thing or a negative thing from a lending point of view. Obviously I'd have another property with equity in it, but would I also have more risk attached to me? I apologise if this would be better suited in a different forum but I'm desperate to find an answer an thought this looked like a good place to ask. Thanks, Joe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mortitia Posted September 27, 2010 Report Share Posted September 27, 2010 I think it might be viewed as a liability to have this BTL on a mortgage and to try and increase your borrowing. Say you lost your job or became ill - how would you cope - that is what lenders would ask. Borrowing is difficult at the moment and since your father has no equity in a house as back up I would see you as a risk. Let's see what the others think? Mortitia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.