Carol Posted April 29, 2008 Report Share Posted April 29, 2008 Hi, being a fairly new landlord I would be grateful for any opinions on our current tenant issue. We own a couple of properties and have previously added a foot note to our SHTA that a 6 monthly insurance premium is due at the time of tenancy renewal (an insignificant amount of approx £70) which our tenants have happily paid in the past. In effect we insure the properties with buildings insurance and pass the cost on to our tenants. However, our tenants have just signed a renewed aggreement and are refusing to pay the insurance saying it is not down to them - they seem to be in cohoots. It seems such a small amount of money to worry about but its principal now We were just thinking of letting it go and increasing their rent at the next tenancy renewal to cover our costs but I wondered what anybody else would do?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GPEL Posted April 29, 2008 Report Share Posted April 29, 2008 If it's such a small amount then you pay it, afterall it's your responsibility and were lucky to get anything in the 1st place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amc1 Posted April 29, 2008 Report Share Posted April 29, 2008 We've never asked our tenants for a contribution towards the buildings insurance. Our letting agent has led us to believe that it is our responsibility. Don't think there are any hard and fast rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selkirk Posted April 29, 2008 Report Share Posted April 29, 2008 I'd agree that building ins is down to the LL, however, in this instance it's written into the agreement and surely you could enforce that. You won't be able to increase the rent until the AST expires and goes into periodic as far as I'm aware. Incidentally, for leasehold properties I believe the LL pays the service charge and groung rent. cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Dewsberry Posted April 29, 2008 Report Share Posted April 29, 2008 On commercial prop T often (if not always is required to pay contribution) of ins .......BUT on resi AST is likely to put T back up .. If in ast Then i would think enforceable ......but better to just include it in the rent as a single fig IMHO The Rodent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CH1 Posted April 30, 2008 Report Share Posted April 30, 2008 Think it landlords responsibility to pay Buildings insurance and a requirement for mortgage purposes that you have it in place. It is tenants responsibility to decide whether they wish to insure their contents. If it's a leasehold prop. you could ask a tenant for a contribution towards the charge as its upkeeping communal areas which they enjoy use of however, it's up to you in the end to pay for it not tenant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.