Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Grampa

Government's Tenants' Fees Bill may effectively ban tenants with pets

Recommended Posts

The Bill outlines a ban on landlords and agents from requiring tenants to make any payments as a condition of their tenancy with the exception of rent, a security deposit, a holding deposit and tenant default fees.

Specifically the cap on security deposit has already been outlined by the government as being one month’s rent.

However, the NLA says this one month limit will reduce landlords’ willingness to accept pets by removing their flexibility to take a higher deposit to cover for pet damage.

The NLA has previously produced research showing that 47 per cent of member landlords were unwilling to allow pets with 41 per cent of those citing the reason as potential property damage.

The association points out that the Dogs Trust’s Lets With Pets scheme advises landlords to either take a higher deposit or include a “professional cleaning on move-out” clause in the tenancy agreement in order to mitigate the financial risk of property damage.

It may well be that the government’s plans, as currently worded, could very well outlaw these practices. 

“The end result? Even fewer landlords willing to let to tenants with pets” warns the NLA.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its astounding.......that conclusion is so blindingly obvious to everyone except the people who are planning to introduce it.

It makes me wonder why the Gov don't take external advice BEFORE shooting themselves in the foot.

I've realised for many years now that virtually anything any Gov do cannot be relied on.

That's gonna get dropped fast, fairly soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My AST requires T's to obtain written consent for pets, of course at application there is the question of pets and that allows me to reject the application.

So a couple w/o pets moved in over 3 years ago and what do you know there are 2 little doggies. I can hoof 'em but the ill effect of fleas will already be present. Any animal smells are soon there anyway. I can make claim after hoofing against them and/ or their well of g'tor, but I have little confidence in the CC system already and as the strategy I'm using against Compton's demonstrates, recovery of the out of pocket expense is rarely recovered and this ignores the effort required.

I increased their rent by more than £30pm more than I would otherwise. The longer they stay the better off I am and it's their choice, for now. The pile of paving blocks at the front are a new concern though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be your about to get a new drive, patio or path then. If it's done right you'll be squids in. 

Not all dogs have fleas you know....only the ones in Wales apparently ! ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A fair number of the T's have fleas so pretty sure their fluffy pets will have.

Hard to believe they would do a good job with DIY efforts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...